Sunday, February 17, 2013

My Thoughts on Absolute Fate and God


I actually actively disapprove of the doctrine of full comprehensive fate, the idea that God has specifically planned out everything from the beginning of time, to exact detail, so that nothing happens that He did not make happen.

Most people object to the concept of absolute fate because of the idea of hell. If God predestines everything that occurs, and hell exists as a destination for human beings when they die, God must then have predestined millions (or perhaps, depending on how strict your doctrine is on behavior or what your beliefs must be, billions of people, in fact, perhaps even the overwhelming majority of mankind) before they were even born and without ever giving them a real choice, to suffer for a while here on earth and then die and immediately suffer for eternity in hell.

Horrible as the very idea of that is, even if someone somehow says he only believes God knows of that future but doesn’t ensure it, or that no one truly goes to hell, I still despise the very idea of absolute fate. To say that God planned everything specifically, not just planning for outcomes like a building inspector, but literally knew what things would happen and set things in motion to make them happen... that in it of itself is a horrible statement I don’t understand how Christians can say without feeling shame for saying it. In essence that means every sin or evil ever committed in the history of the universe was not only tolerated by God, but directly His fault. I can only imagine the awkwardness of trying to explain this doctrine to grieving parents who just lost a little one. Jesus did not then die to save us from our sins, but only as a part of an overall plan in which our role is merely as puppets.

Life is not a movie and God is not a director. I firmly believe the choices we make in this life are ours to own. God does not make decisions for us, and indeed does NOT always know what our decisions will be.

God Himself has changed His mind in the past based on human behavior. If He has not changed His mind, as many say He has not, then the Bible is simply a series of nice stories, for He does this time and time again in the old testament, from Genesis on. (Genesis 18:17- 19:29, Exodus 4:10-16, Exodus 4:24-26, Exodus 32:1-14, Numbers 14:11-23, Judges 2:20-23, just for starters) He even routinely makes His promises conditional and His prophets discuss what ifs as though alternate decisions could indeed have been made by people, other than those decisions made (1 Samuel 13:5-14). The Bible and reality scream that the doctrine of absolute fate cannot be true. God did not cause all the evil in the universe and I do not, nor would I ever, worship a god of evil.

To those wishing to debate with me, before you try, answer me this, why bother? If God predestined me to be this way, then there is nothing you can do to make me not this way. You’re arguments, no matter how well crafted, will be meaningless, as I will only “change my mind” if God predestined that I would do so before you or I were even born. Thus what is the point of discussion with a being who has no independent thought, from a being that has no independent thought?

Before someone asks what value life has if God did not predestine every second, therefore giving it all a purpose, answer me this. Of what value is your love for God if He programmed you to have it before you were born? Of what value is God’s love for you if you can only interact with Him as He dictates, with less independent thought than a computer AI? I submit to you that if all of life on this earth was planned out before it even occurred, then it has no value at all. What is the value of something that happens only because it was forced to happen?

Purpose and fate are different. A mother’s purpose is to protect and raise her child. However she may abandon that child on a whim to burn alive inside a car on a hot day, because she was running late to work. The purpose of the mother was the care she did not provide, the slow death of the child was his fate, which she set in motion with no care of what he wanted. Thus is the difference between fate and purpose.

Before you say I am short on faith for not believing God to predestine us, and for daring to imply that God is a limited being, for indeed He would have to be if I am right, think about this. I place faith in God despite knowing He cannot satisfy all my desires for the universe on a whim. I have faith that whatever He is doing, it is for the best, and He is doing the best that can be done. I have faith that He will always be righteous and have the best in mind. I believe that He even created the universe in 6 days, despite being told the world created itself in 6 trillion years. How is that not faith? To say I have little faith, is the same as to say to someone who does not believe in Santa Clause that they have little faith. If our views differ, it does not mean one of us lacks faith.

Before anyone says that I am rejecting God’s authority... oh boy, think about that for even a few seconds. If God predestined me to rebel, His will and purpose is that I rebel... how then can it really be rebellion anyway? Isn’t rebellion NOT doing what someone wants? And aren’t you only defining my actions by your beliefs rather than in an objective manner? I could say that those who believe in fate must not believe in responsibility, and must believe that way so they can escape any semblance of guilt for their actions. But I know they probably don’t believe that way and such a statement only reflects my feelings on the subject not theirs. I say God does not predestine our actions, because I see that as more an accusation than a worshipful thing to say, and because I see that the Bible clearly states otherwise. My thoughts on this matter are no rebellion against anything save for modern theology.

Review: Daniel and the Sun Sword


Daniel and the Sun Sword by Nathan Lumbatis


Well here we are, another story with a score over 9, which means I’m almost contractually obligated to say the author should go straight to a publisher... well he could, I truly believe he could. However from my personal point of view there are a few issues I would recommend fixing before he goes to a publisher anyway. And as far as outright promoting this work personally... that’s in the air. Read the note at the end if you’re curious.

The story here was actually very exciting and well written, if a bit cliché. I’ve said it before on that end (if not here than somewhere else), if the clichés weren’t good, they wouldn’t be clichés, thus no, that isn’t a bad thing in my book. There are a few negatives in that, since the major plot points of the book were pretty easy to predict, but lest we forget that the journey is often more important than the destination. The characters were likeable when they were supposed to be and hate-able when they were meant to be and the message felt like it would win almost anyone over.

This is a Christian story and is as black and white as those stories often are. To be fair, I often enjoy a good straight forward story with no moral gray areas though, and really, there’s no undo amount of preaching. The story does talk about a lot of modern Christian doctrine at length, but avoids outright calling anyone a heathen or even coming close to criticizing other ideologies. Not to say that criticizing other faiths can never be done or done right, but this story seems meant to be have broad appeal and it pulls that off. It is not a 23 chapter sermon disguised as a children’s adventure.

How did the story fare rating wise? Well Mr. Lumbatis almost got a bonus point which would have gotten him a ten, but he lost it as the story went on, which is something I’ll address in the review body. Still, 9.25 out of twelve possible and zero bonus points means he did pretty well. Normally, I’d say he just needs a few grammar revisions at this point, but like I said before, there are a few issues he might like to address first.
As to the objectionable rating, here we go. As to gore, there is blood but very little, I’ll only give that a -1. There is also a number of mentions of child abuse and even torture, meaning I would have to give a -2 for innocent characters being subjected to punishment beyond criminal level, but never on camera to an extreme degree. As to violence, don’t ask me to explain exactly how, but this story manages to be themed around a war, but none of the characters in the story actually die, meaning again, only a -1. Finally, a -1 for ideology I take issue with (see note at the end). This goes to a total of -5 out of a possible -25. Generally a good read for slightly older children. (Really this is probably the same rating Lost and Found would have gotten were I to review it.)

__________________________________________________________
A classic story of good vs. evil with a Christian spin, Daniel and the Sun Sword is an enrapturing story that children will enjoy. While the story is pointedly Christian, there is nothing that most people would find all that objectionable, even if they’re not of that persuasion and the story can be objectively enjoyed. The characters are memorable, the story is fast paced and I had a hard time putting it down, despite being outside the target age range.
__________________________________________________________
And with the author plug out of the way, here are the details of how the score was decided:
Warning: Spoilers may be ahead.

  1. Spelling/Grammar
Score: ¾
And here is where many people want me to get specific, but I rarely see a point. If something major in the story needs to be changed, then there’s little point in me pointing out grammar mistakes that may be rewritten. Mr. Lumbatis has a good command of his writing and though he does have the occasional mistake, it’s not enough to make anything hard to read, nor to suggest an actual problem that he himself could not track down after a few rereads. I would tell him to read the story aloud a few times and he should find most of them.

  1. Interesting Plot
Score: 1
As I said, much of this story feels a little cliché. It’s a story where God chooses a series of champions to fight the devil, with your normal line up of the rebel, the abandoned and the middle class kid. No bonus points for guessing that the rebel turns out to have questionable allegiances or for guessing that the story centers on the abandoned kid’s journey to a better circumstance and acceptance of his past. Those things are par for the course, but the question is, are they pulled off in an interesting manner that you’ll want to read this version of the story of the trio of destined champions? Well yes actually. Daniel (the abandoned) is a relatable character and Ben (the middle class kid) is likeable as a person and sounds like he would be a good friend. Raylin (the rebel) does step off the straight and narrow, but not for unbelievable reasons and I was interested to see how she was won back over which... actually she wasn’t fully, which was probably the only really not so black and white ending to the story. The story is also open for obvious sequels and I would enjoy seeing those. The story is also very convincing in most of the messages it tries to put forth.

  1. Good Direction
Score: 1
Actually this story’s logic and reasoning were very easy to follow. The pace of the story was just right, not moving without explaining things, or spending too much time on scenes that didn’t need to exist. Really despite not feeling much suspense, I still felt myself enjoying reading each page. There are a few mistakes, which I pointed out to the author already, but for the most part very little is out of place. (Those mistakes I would recommend the author fix before attempting to publish, as they were pretty bad mistakes, if not far reaching.)

  1. Author Interest
Score: 1
Mr. Lumbatis actively promotes his book.

  1. Believable Main Characters
Score: ¾
As with many stories of black and white, the characters can only be so believable. The main cast is believable for the most part, but other people are often laughably unrealistic. No one like the Gurges exists in real life, thank God, but that didn’t stop me from enjoying their nigh cartoon villain type abuse of Daniel in a slightly sadist light. (Get off your high horse if you laughed at Wile E Coyote, the abuse scenes were not that dark.) Most of the villains are straight up sadists or have ridiculously over inflated egos. At times these antagonist were funny, awesome and even scary. Who knows why, but we all love villains that can make us feel emotions about them, without feeling realistic. (Yes I believe in the devil, but no one really knows his motivations in real life, we only assume straight forward unsympathetic ones.)
  1. Likable Main Characters
Score: 1
Now we get to my major reason for saying the author might want to do a rewrite. The writer pulled a Jar-Jar Binks. A main character who becomes very obnoxious, has no real power of his own to drive the plot and is constantly becoming a damsel in distress stand in. Ben. This actually drove me nuts as in the beginning of the story, almost every character was perfect, INCLUDING Ben. Daniel was believable and sympathetic, Raylin was a tough girl who was very useful in a fight and Ben was a kid with little skill or luck, but a heart of gold, determined to help people he didn’t even know despite his fear and inadequacies. However once the main plot got going, Ben’s determination went away and he became so terrified of even mostly benign things he would become physically ill. I got that this was supposed to set up a character arch for Ben, teaching the value of bravery but... it just didn’t work. Ben early in the story possibly risks life and limb to help Daniel escape abusive adoptive parents and even helps fight a 16 year old champion high school wrestler (himself only in junior high) when he has no talent at all for martial arts. He’s nervous through all of these events, but seems to have very little to learn about bravery. It feels more like the lesson concerning Ben should have been about true courage and recognizing that just because someone doesn’t have awesome powers or know martial arts, doesn’t mean they’re useless. However Ben WAS useless from that point on. Or maybe the lesson could have been that one needs to not be naive and prepare for bad things in life to happen. Ben could have learned a few martial arts moves and been woken up to just how much he needed to think about life outside the protective arms of his parents. However he just whined about wanting to go home for the entire journey. To Mr. Lumbatis, please, fix this character, I LIKED him in the beginning. I felt like he was being picked on and I wanted to defend him. Despite my disappointment with Ben, I loved the other characters and felt the villains were just the right level of awesome. The author maintains a good score here, if only because he sacrificed the bonus point he almost got.

  1. Likable Side Characters
Score: 1
This story had several side characters, but they weren’t just window dressing. Everyone in the story had a personality and a life beyond just the main story. (Aside from Daniel as this was HIS story so his life was pretty much contained therein. Still had great personality.) The author even avoided having characters show up just be killed or injured to show how buff his baddies were. Bad, good and neutral, all of the side characters were interesting to read and a few of them could have had books of their own.

  1. Good Scene Descriptions
Score: 1
Mr. Lumbatis was great at describing different settings and objects. At times I felt like I was watching a movie, but one not directed by Michal Bay. I could understand what things were supposed to look like, even when the writer was having massive explosions go off and epic battles.

  1. Targeting
Score: 1
This is a story targeted directly at young Christian audiences. That being said, its doctrine was pretty on the nose and mainstream so I think most Christian parents would approve it. It was also enjoyable in its own right, and had enough action and comedy to keep younger minds engaged.

  1. Broad Appeal
Score: ¾
As I said this story is exciting, not condemning of other religions in tone and just all around fun. However its doctrine is very on the nose and if you understand certain doctrines and don’t agree with them, you’re going to find yourself having serious problems. This story does not allow for wiggle room, even on minor points. This is a category which I would strongly suggest the author think about. The story would probably fair better allowing things to be more general, just telling a story similar to Christianity, like the Chronicles of Narnia, that just hits the major points.



Note:
The views expressed in the following are the heart felt beliefs of the author of this blog and each person can take or leave them as he wishes.

Like I said earlier, I have a personal problem with this story. One that I can’t in good conscience ignore to the point of total unbiased promotion. Again, since the story does not allow for wiggle room, demanding that its doctrines are RIGHT, I myself have a problem. The story insists that nothing in life occurs without a purpose, more specifically eluding to the idea that God Himself plans everything. I seriously disagree.

If anyone is interested, my full opinion on absolute fate is on the next blog entry. The entry is not to be seen as a condemnation or refutation of anything Mr. Lumbatis has said to me himself, simply a cross examination of a doctrine he promoted in his book. Do no read on if you do not wish to see someone challenge the doctrine that God plans out everything ahead of time, or wish not to feel the need to question it yourself. You have been warned.